By Mieder Van Loggerenberg
The Relevance and Application of the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy in Modern Education
This academic article explores the revised Bloom's Taxonomy, highlighting the differences between the old and revised versions, the importance of teachers understanding it, how it is used, and its role in curriculum planning, design, and lesson planning. It provides a detailed description of the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, along with associated verbs and example activities for each level. The article also discusses the significance of learning objectives and learning outcomes and reviews the impact of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy on teaching effectiveness.
1. Introduction
Education is a dynamic field, constantly evolving to meet the changing needs of students and society. In this ever-evolving landscape, the revised Bloom's Taxonomy stands as a foundational framework, providing educators with a structured approach to cognitive development. This article delves into the revised Bloom's Taxonomy, highlighting its significance for teachers, curriculum planning, and effective lesson design. We will explore the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, their associated verbs, and example activities and investigate whether the revised taxonomy genuinely benefits teachers and should be implemented into their teaching practices.
2. Bloom's Taxonomy: Old vs. Revised
To understand the significance of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy, it's crucial to first differentiate it from the original version created by Benjamin Bloom and his colleagues in the 1950s. The original taxonomy consisted of six levels from lowest to highest cognitive complexity: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. While this framework was groundbreaking in its time, it had its limitations, particularly in addressing the complexities of modern education and the need for a more comprehensive understanding of learning.
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy, introduced by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl in the early 2000s, sought to address these limitations. It restructured the original taxonomy into three distinct domains, Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor, and emphasized action verbs associated with each level, providing educators with a more precise tool for creating meaningful learning experiences. The revised taxonomy offered a more flexible and adaptable framework that has become increasingly relevant in today's diverse and dynamic educational landscape.
3. The Importance of Understanding the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
Educators must grasp the revised Bloom's Taxonomy for several compelling reasons:
3.1. Enhanced Curriculum Planning and Design
The revised taxonomy plays a pivotal role in curriculum planning and design. It empowers educators to structure their curriculum to align with specific learning objectives, ensuring that students are exposed to a range of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor experiences that foster comprehensive development. This alignment fosters a cohesive and goal-oriented learning journey for students.
3.2. Effective Lesson Planning
When teachers understand the revised taxonomy, they can create well-structured lessons designed to engage students at various cognitive levels. This ensures that learning remains challenging and interesting, catering to students' diverse learning styles and abilities. By incorporating various cognitive, affective, and psychomotor activities, teachers can provide a well-rounded and enriching educational experience.
[Source: Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. http:// www.celt.iastate.edu/pdfs-docs/teaching/RevisedBloomsHandout.pdf]
4. How do teachers use the revised Bloom's Taxonomy?
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy is used by teachers in various ways to enhance their instructional strategies, design meaningful learning experiences, and assess student learning. Here's how teachers utilize the taxonomy:
4.1 Curriculum Planning:
Teachers use the revised Bloom's Taxonomy to structure their curriculum, ensuring that learning objectives and activities align with the taxonomy's cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. This alignment helps in developing a cohesive and goal-oriented curriculum.
4.2 Learning Objective Development:
Teachers create clear and specific learning objectives for their lessons based on the levels of the taxonomy. These objectives articulate what students should know or be able to do at the end of the lesson, guiding instruction.
4.3 Lesson Design:
The taxonomy serves as a framework for designing lessons that engage students at various cognitive levels. Teachers incorporate activities encouraging students to remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, and create knowledge, providing a balanced and comprehensive learning experience.
4.4 Assessment and Evaluation:
Teachers use the taxonomy to develop assessments that align with the intended learning outcomes. This helps ensure that assessments measure what students have learned at the appropriate level of cognitive complexity. Assessment methods may include quizzes, tests, essays, projects, and presentations.
4.5 Questioning and Discussion:
Teachers use Bloom's Taxonomy to structure their questions in class, moving from lower-level questions (e.g., "What is the definition of...?") to higher-level questions (e.g., "How might this concept be applied to...?"). This encourages critical thinking, class discussions, and deeper understanding.
4.6 Differentiation:
The taxonomy allows teachers to differentiate instruction to meet the needs of diverse learners. They can provide additional challenges for advanced students by focusing on higher-order thinking while providing additional support to those who need it.
4.7 Progress Monitoring:
Teachers can use the taxonomy to track student progress. By assessing which level of the taxonomy students are consistently achieving, teachers can adjust their instruction and provide targeted support to students who may be struggling.
4.8 Student Engagement:
By offering a variety of activities and assessments at different cognitive levels, teachers can keep students engaged and motivated. This variety caters to different learning styles and preferences.
4.9 Skill Development:
In addition to cognitive development, the revised taxonomy guides the development of affective and psychomotor skills. Teachers can design activities that foster values, attitudes, and practical skills, enhancing the holistic development of their students.
4.10 Professional Development:
Teachers can use the revised Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance their own professional development. They can learn how to design more effective lessons, assessments, and learning objectives to improve their teaching practices.
4.11 Data-Driven Instruction:
The taxonomy enables teachers to analyze assessment data to make data-driven decisions. They can determine whether students are achieving the desired outcomes and make adjustments to their instructional strategies accordingly.
4.12 Continuous Improvement:
Teachers can use the taxonomy as a tool for continuous improvement in their teaching practices. They can refine and optimize their instruction by reflecting on the alignment between learning objectives, activities, and assessments.
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy is a versatile tool that empowers teachers to plan, design, and assess instruction effectively. It encourages a balanced and comprehensive approach to teaching and learning, ultimately benefiting students by promoting deeper understanding, critical thinking, and well-rounded development.
5. The Three Domains of the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy comprises three distinct domains, each with a range of levels that reflect varying degrees of cognitive complexity. Let's explore each domain in detail:
5.1 Cognitive Domain
The cognitive domain is concerned with intellectual abilities and cognitive processes. It is organized into six levels, from lower-order thinking to higher-order thinking:
5.1.1 Remembering:
This level involves recalling facts, concepts, or previously learned material. Associated action verbs include "define," "list," and "recite."
Example Activity: Create flashcards to recall key terms.
5.1.2 Understanding:
Understanding goes beyond mere recall and involves comprehension of concepts and ideas. Action verbs for this level include "describe," "explain," and "interpret."
Example Activity: Explain a concept in your own words.
5.1.3 Applying:
At this level, students use knowledge and understanding to solve problems and apply concepts in various contexts. Action verbs include "apply," "solve," and "use."
Example Activity: Solve real-world problems using learned principles.
5.1.4 Analyzing:
Analyzing requires students to break down complex ideas into smaller components, identifying patterns and relationships. Associated verbs include "analyze," "compare," and "contrast."
Example Activity: Compare and contrast different approaches to a problem.
5.1.5 Evaluating:
This level involves assessing the value and significance of information and ideas. Action verbs include "evaluate," "justify," and "appraise."
Example Activity: Critique a historical event, providing reasons for your evaluation.
5.1.6 Creating:
The highest level involves synthesizing information and generating new ideas or products. Action verbs for this level include "design," "compose," and "construct."
Example Activity: Design an innovative solution to a societal issue.
5.2 Affective Domain
The affective domain focuses on emotions, attitudes, and values. It helps students develop their emotional intelligence and ethical judgment. The affective domain consists of five levels:
5.2.1 Receiving:
At this level, students are merely aware of a particular stimulus or idea.
Example Activity: Listen attentively to a guest speaker.
5.2.2 Responding:
In this stage, students are willing to participate and engage with the stimulus.
Example Activity: Engage in class discussions and provide opinions.
5.2.3 Valuing:
Valuing entails developing a commitment to specific attitudes and values.
Example Activity: Discuss and reflect on personal values.
5.2.4 Organizing:
At this level, students begin to integrate values into their belief system and demonstrate consistent behavior based on these values.
Example Activity: Create a personal code of ethics.
5.2.5 Characterizing:
The highest level involves fully internalizing and consistently demonstrating values and beliefs.
Example Activity: Demonstrate consistent ethical behavior in daily life.
5.3 Psychomotor Domain
The psychomotor domain pertains to physical skills, coordination, and motor abilities. It encompasses five levels of proficiency:
5.3.1 Imitation:
Students can mimic a skill or action demonstrated by others.
Example Activity: Mimic a dance routine demonstrated by an instructor.
5.3.2 Manipulation:
At this stage, students can perform a skill with some degree of proficiency.
Example Activity: Practice a musical instrument until you can play a simple tune.
5.3.3 Precision:
Precision involves the ability to perform a skill accurately and consistently.
Example Activity: Improve your golf swing to achieve more accurate shots.
5.3.4 Articulation:
Articulation reflects the ability to perform complex skills fluently and easily.
Example Activity: Perform a complex gymnastics routine with fluidity.
5.3.5 Naturalization:
This highest level signifies the mastery of a skill to the point where it becomes second nature.
Example Activity: Execute advanced yoga poses effortlessly.
6. Learning Objectives vs. Learning Outcomes
To ensure effective education, it's essential to differentiate between learning objectives and learning outcomes:
6.1 Learning Objectives:
Learning objectives are specific, measurable statements that outline what students should be able to do at the end of a lesson or course. They guide the teaching process and help educators align instruction with desired outcomes.
6.2 Learning Outcomes:
Learning outcomes are the observable results of instruction, reflecting what students have actually achieved. They provide evidence of learning and serve as a basis for assessment and evaluation.
Learning objectives set the stage for effective instruction, providing a clear path for educators to follow. Learning outcomes, on the other hand, serve as indicators of success, enabling educators to assess the effectiveness of their teaching strategies.
7. Examples of learning outcomes based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
7.1 Cognitive Domain:
Level 1: Remembering
Grade Level: Elementary School (1st-3rd Grade)
·Recall the names of the planets in the solar system.
·List the continents on Earth.
·Identify basic geometric shapes like circles, squares, and triangles.
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Recall the major events of the American Revolution.
·Remember the key elements of the periodic table, including symbols and atomic numbers.
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Memorize the principles of classical physics, such as Newton's laws of motion.
·Recite the chemical reactions involved in cellular respiration.
Level 2: Understanding
Grade Level: Elementary School (1st-3rd Grade)
·Explain the concept of time, including the past, present, and future.
·Describe the basic life cycle of a butterfly, focusing on the stages of metamorphosis.
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Interpret a map to understand distances and locations.
·Explain how supply and demand affect pricing in a market economy.
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Summarize the major components and functions of cellular organelles.
·Analyze a literary work's use of symbolism to convey thematic elements.
Level 3: Applying
Grade Level: Elementary School (1st-3rd Grade)
·Solve simple addition and subtraction word problems using basic math facts.
·Use phonics knowledge to read and spell words with consonant blends.
·Create artwork using basic geometric shapes.
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Apply the scientific method to conduct a simple experiment.
·Solve multi-step algebraic equations to find the values of variables.
·Apply persuasive writing techniques to construct an argumentative essay.
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Apply the principles of Newton's laws of motion to analyze objects in motion.
·Implement statistical analysis to draw conclusions from collected data.
·Create and program a computer application to solve real-world problems.
Level 4: Analyzing
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Analyze a historical event by considering its causes, consequences, and key players.
·Examine and compare different art movements and their influences on each other.
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Analyze a Shakespearean play to identify recurring themes and motifs.
·Evaluate the impact of a specific historical event on the sociopolitical landscape of a region.
Level 5: Evaluating
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Evaluate the effectiveness of a business strategy in terms of profitability and sustainability.
·Critique the ethical implications of a scientific experiment involving human subjects.
Level 6: Creating
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Create an original short story that incorporates various literary elements.
·Design a comprehensive environmental sustainability plan for a local community.
7.2 Affective Domain:
Level 1: Receiving
Grade Level: Elementary School (1st-3rd Grade)
·Show appreciation for various musical instruments by attending a live performance.
·Express interest in different cultures by listening to stories from around the world.
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Actively participate in class discussions by listening and providing thoughtful responses.
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Demonstrate open-mindedness by respectfully considering diverse perspectives on complex social issues.
Level 2: Responding
Grade Level: Elementary School (1st-3rd Grade)
·Exhibit curiosity by asking questions about the natural world and seeking answers.
·Show empathy by offering assistance to classmates in need.
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Engage in discussions about ethical dilemmas and express personal opinions on them.
·Demonstrate active listening skills by responding appropriately to others' points of view.
Level 3: Valuing
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Express the importance of honesty and integrity in personal actions.
·Advocate for fairness and equality in school and community settings.
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Demonstrate a commitment to environmental sustainability by participating in relevant initiatives.
·Promote respect and tolerance in relationships with peers from diverse backgrounds.
Level 4: Organizing
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Formulate a personal code of ethics that guides decision-making and behavior.
·Organize and lead a student-led community service project addressing a specific societal issue.
Level 5: Characterizing
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Consistently exhibit ethical behavior based on established values in personal and academic life.
·Serve as a role model in promoting tolerance, empathy, and social responsibility in the school community.
7.3 Psychomotor Domain:
Level 1: Imitation
Grade Level: Elementary School (1st-3rd Grade)
·Imitate basic dance movements following a teacher's demonstration.
·Mimic the strokes of a professional artist when drawing or painting.
Level 2: Manipulation
Grade Level: Middle School (6th-8th Grade)
·Manipulate simple laboratory equipment to conduct scientific experiments.
·Apply motor skills to play a musical instrument, such as the piano or guitar.
Level 3: Precision
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Perform intricate surgical procedures with precision and accuracy in a simulated medical setting.
·Create fine art sculptures that require delicate carving and shaping techniques.
Level 4: Articulation
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Articulate complex yoga poses with fluidity and precision.
·Execute intricate dance routines seamlessly and with emotional expression.
Level 5: Naturalization
Grade Level: High School (9th-12th Grade)
·Reach a level of expertise in a particular sport, making advanced techniques appear effortless.
·Achieve mastery in culinary arts, preparing gourmet dishes with skill and creativity.
These examples illustrate how learning outcomes can be structured across the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, encompassing the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, with each level representing progressively more complex learning objectives suitable for various grade levels.
8. Does the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Improve Teaching Effectiveness?
A fundamental question arises regarding the utility of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy: does it genuinely help teachers become more effective in the classroom? Several studies have sought to address this question.
Research indicates that the revised taxonomy offers educators a more comprehensive and adaptable framework for designing lessons that engage students at varying cognitive levels. Teachers can promote deeper understanding and higher-order thinking skills by using action verbs to guide their instructional strategies. Furthermore, the taxonomy provides a structured approach to addressing the affective and psychomotor domains, fostering a more holistic approach to education.
Incorporating the revised Bloom's Taxonomy into teaching has been found to promote critical thinking, problem-solving, and creative skills in students. This, in turn, equips them to tackle real-world challenges with confidence and competence.
Additionally, aligning learning objectives with desired learning outcomes, as facilitated by the revised taxonomy, allows educators to measure the effectiveness of their instruction. This assessment enables them to make data-driven adjustments to their teaching methods, further enhancing their impact on student learning.
9. Should Teachers Implement Bloom's Taxonomy into Their Teaching?
The evidence suggests that teachers should indeed implement the revised Bloom's Taxonomy into their teaching practices. By doing so, educators can reap numerous benefits, including:
9.1 Improved Student Engagement
The taxonomy provides a structured approach to designing engaging and challenging lessons for students. Catering to various cognitive levels ensures that learning remains dynamic and interesting.
9.2 Enhanced Critical Thinking
Incorporating the taxonomy encourages the development of critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities, and creativity in students. These are essential skills for success in an increasingly complex world.
9.3 Holistic Development
The taxonomy addresses cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, promoting a more holistic approach to education. This not only benefits students academically but also emotionally and physically.
9.4 Assessment and Adaptation
The taxonomy helps educators set clear learning objectives and outcomes, enabling them to assess their effectiveness and make data-driven adjustments to their teaching methods.
10. How can students benefit from teachers using the revised Bloom's Taxonomy?
Students can benefit significantly when teachers use the revised Bloom's Taxonomy as a framework for designing and delivering instruction. Here are several ways in which students can gain from this approach:
10.1 Enhanced Understanding:
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy encourages teachers to focus on ensuring that students remember and understand information. This leads to a deeper comprehension of the subject matter, which is essential for long-term retention and practical application of knowledge.
10.1 Diverse Learning Experiences:
Teachers who incorporate the revised taxonomy into their teaching are more likely to provide various learning experiences. This caters to different learning styles and preferences, making the educational process more engaging and effective for a broader range of students.
10.2 Critical Thinking Development:
The taxonomy emphasizes higher-order thinking skills like analyzing, evaluating, and creating. As a result, students are challenged to think critically, solve problems, and apply their knowledge in real-world contexts. These skills are essential for success in higher education and in professional life.
10.3 Increased Engagement:
By using the revised Bloom's Taxonomy, teachers can design more interactive and engaging lessons. Students are actively involved in the learning process, which can lead to increased motivation, participation, and overall interest in the subject matter.
10.4 Personalized Learning:
The taxonomy allows for differentiation in instruction, as teachers can tailor their lessons to meet the needs of individual students. This approach ensures that students can progress at their own pace and receive the support they need to succeed.
10.5 Better Assessment:
Using the revised taxonomy, teachers can develop more meaningful and varied assessments. This enables a more accurate evaluation of students' knowledge, skills, and abilities, providing valuable feedback for both students and teachers.
10.6 Holistic Development:
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy encompasses not only the cognitive domain but also the affective and psychomotor domains. This holistic approach to education fosters emotional intelligence, values, ethics, and physical skills, ensuring that students develop well-rounded capabilities.
10.7 Transferable Skills:
Students benefit from learning higher-order cognitive skills as they can apply them to various academic subjects and real-life situations. These skills are transferable and can be useful in problem-solving, decision-making, and creative endeavors across different domains.
10.8 Alignment with Learning Objectives:
When teachers align their instructional methods with clear learning objectives, students are more aware of their expectations. This alignment provides a sense of direction, purpose, and structure, making learning outcomes more achievable and understandable.
10.9 Greater Confidence and Independence:
As students engage in activities requiring critical thinking and problem-solving, they become more confident in their ability to tackle complex challenges. They also develop a greater sense of independence in their learning, which can be valuable in higher education and beyond.
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy benefits students by promoting deeper understanding, critical thinking, engagement, and a well-rounded education. When teachers use this framework effectively, they create a learning environment that supports students in developing the skills and knowledge they need to succeed academically and in their future careers.
11. What are the drawbacks of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy
While the revised Bloom's Taxonomy offers numerous benefits, it has limitations and criticisms. Some of the cons or drawbacks associated with the taxonomy include:
11.1 Complexity:
The revised taxonomy is more complex and detailed than the original version. This complexity can make it challenging for educators to understand and apply, particularly for those new to the concept or with limited training in educational theory.
11.2 Subjectivity:
Determining the appropriate level of cognitive complexity for specific learning objectives or assessments can be subjective. Different educators may interpret and apply the taxonomy differently, potentially leading to inconsistent expectations and outcomes.
11.3 Overemphasis on Cognitive Domain:
While the revised Bloom's Taxonomy includes the affective and psychomotor domains, there is a historical emphasis on the cognitive domain. This may lead to neglecting the development of affective and psychomotor skills in the classroom.
11.4 Time-Consuming:
Designing and implementing activities and assessments at all levels of the taxonomy can be time-consuming. Teachers may find it challenging to create a diverse range of activities that adequately address each level of cognitive complexity.
11.5 Potential for Overuse:
Overemphasizing the use of Bloom's Taxonomy in lesson planning can lead to the overuse of specific verbs or cognitive levels, resulting in a rigid and predictable instructional approach that may not always align with the unique needs of students.
11.6 Not a One-Size-Fits-All Solution:
The taxonomy is a framework, but it may not be suitable for every subject, age group, or learning context. Educators should consider the appropriateness of the taxonomy for their specific teaching situation.
11.7 Limited Focus on Creativity:
The taxonomy includes the "Creating" level, but some critics argue that it does not emphasize fostering creativity and innovation in students. Creativity is increasingly recognized as a crucial skill in the 21st century.
11.8 Potential for Overemphasis on Testing:
In some educational systems, the revised taxonomy may be linked to high-stakes testing, leading to teaching to the test rather than fostering a well-rounded, holistic education.
11.9 Cultural and Contextual Bias:
The taxonomy's structure may not fully account for cultural and contextual differences in learning. What is considered a high-level skill or value in one culture may not be the same in another.
11.10 Adaptation Challenges:
Adapting the revised taxonomy to the needs of individual students or specific learning environments can be challenging. Educators may struggle to implement the taxonomy effectively without significant support and professional development.
11.11 Narrowly Defined Verbs:
The taxonomy provides a list of verbs associated with each level, which can be seen as overly prescriptive. Some argue that it restricts educators' flexibility and creativity in designing learning activities.
While the revised Bloom's Taxonomy is a valuable tool for educational planning and assessment, it is not a panacea and has its limitations. Educators should be aware of these drawbacks and consider how best to use the taxonomy in a way that aligns with their teaching objectives and the unique needs of their students.
12. Conclusion
The revised Bloom's Taxonomy provides educators with a valuable framework for improving curriculum planning, lesson design, and overall teaching effectiveness. By understanding the taxonomy's three domains, associated verbs, and example activities, teachers can create engaging and comprehensive learning experiences for their students. The taxonomy's adaptability and alignment with learning objectives and outcomes make it a valuable tool for modern education.
While implementing the revised taxonomy may require effort and adjustment on the part of educators, the benefits in terms of student engagement, critical thinking development, and holistic learning far outweigh the initial challenges. Research supports the positive impact of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy on teaching and learning, making it a valuable resource for educators seeking to provide quality education in a constantly evolving world.
Bloom’s Verbs and Matching Assessment Types
[Source: The Tenth Annual Curriculum Mapping Institute: Snowbird Utah, July15-18, 2004. Adapted from Benjamin Bloom]
Avoid Using Verbs that are not Measurable
In order for an objective to give maximum structure to instruction, it should be free of vague or ambiguous words or phrases. The following lists notoriously ambiguous words or phrases that should be avoided to make the intended outcome concise and explicit.
WORDS TO AVOID
PHRASES TO AVOID
Bloom’s Taxonomy: Structuring The Learning Journey
Bloom's Taxonomy In 5 Minutes
Bloom's Taxonomy: Why, How, & Top Examples
References:
·Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
·Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
·Crowe, A., Dirr, B., & Smith, C. (2008). Developing higher level thinking. College Teaching, 56(3), 109-115.
·Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory and Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
·Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
·Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD.
·Dave, R. H. (1970). Psychomotor domain. In R. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Developing and writing behavioral objectives (pp. 161-218). Educational Innovators Press.
·Krathwohl, D. R., & Anderson, L. W. (2009). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.
·Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Brookline Books.
·Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
·Oermann, M. H., & Gaberson, K. B. (2009). Evaluation and testing in nursing education. Springer Publishing Company.
·Chua, S. L., Chen, W. C., & Wong, A. F. (2016). Influence of Bloom's Taxonomy-Based Learning Outcomes on Quality Assurance in Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), 2505-2515.
·Van Der Vossen, H. G. M. (2018). Bloom's Taxonomy and assessment of higher order thinking in veterinary medical education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 45(2), 133-144.
·Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2007). Integrating technology for meaningful learning. Cengage Learning.
·Krathwohl, D. R., & Smith, N. L. (2005). How to prepare a taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.
ความคิดเห็น